Thursday, December 6, 2007

Sauce For The Goose

AGWN thinks education is the answer to the outdated stereotypes perpetuated by Irene Mathyssen.

I call for Irene Mathyssen to be sent to attend gender sensitivity training. During the training, she will be asked to learn that not all men are slavering dogs, and that all men deserve the benefit of the doubt.

24 comments:

Elaine said...

That is a good idea. I doubt Irene even considered what this false allegation would do to Moore.

To be falsely accused publicly just so some silly twit feels it will gain her political points is about as low as one can go.

"I have very good vision. I know what I saw,"-Irene Mathyssen

Vision, you don't have.

Did you see how, single-handily, how your false allegation set the womens movement back 100 years? Did you see how your portrayal of women, as silly hysterical know-nothings, being an impediment for legitimate concerns that will be ignored now?

You had visions all right, of grandeur. You have gotten lots of mileage out of the Gamil Gharbi murders, but even that won't save you from the fate of being known as a pathetic, man-hating, feminazi.

Elaine said...

Another englightening poll from the lfp

In your view, who should apologize?

NDP MP Irene Mathyssen 66%
Tory MP James Moore 34%


Total Votes for this Question: 160


To think this was even considered a question shows you how truly dumb our media is.

Elaine said...

http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/National/2007/12/07/4712365-sun.html

Mathyssen stands by her complaint-lfp

So she is not apologizing. Moore is going to take the only option he has left, he is going to have to sue her. Just like David Oliver sued the ndp for lying about him.

mariposa said...

What an idiot and a loser. As a woman, I am deeply embarassed that she and I are the same gender. She disgusts me.

From that freeps article:
Mathyssen said she knows what she saw and that she saw it clearly, because it was displayed full-screen. "I was so shocked. I couldn't believe what I was seeing."

That shocks her??? This from a woman who participates in the pride parades where there's gay men in various stages of undress, done up to look like slutty women - and this shocks her?

I hope he sues her - she repeated her claims to reporters outside the House of Commons, so I'd say there's no parliamentary privilege (or whatever it's called) to protect her.

eng said...

I hope he sues her - she repeated her claims to reporters outside the House of Commons, so I'd say there's no parliamentary privilege (or whatever it's called) to protect her.

That's her plan, fool. She knows what she saw, and he is now showing some other picture of his girlfriend to claim that is what she saw.

Of course for discovery, his computer will have to be scanned. Do you think there is no porn there? One picture of a 17 year old's tit is all she needs to have him on kiddie porn charges.

Sue away! The trap is set.

Elaine said...

eng, that is so ndp Ireneish of you. It went from a false allegation of porn on his computer, to now being child pornography. Where is your boss taliban Jack, who never missed an opportunity to jump in front of a camera?

Irene's goose is cooked. She is that stupid, or thinks the riding of London-Fanshawe is that stupid, that she lies to them via the London free press, and then tells the house of commons and the national newspapers a whole different story.

Irene the hysterical lying bag of dirt, will get her comuppence from the house. Even people in her own party do not trust her, and are ashamed of her.

Best thing that can happen to Canada is to keep foolish silly twits, like Irene, representing the ndp party. That ensures they will never be in a position of power. The bad thing is,...well no bad thing for Canada, the ndp will never be taken seriously.

Just bad for the ndp and it's boss, taliban Jack, who will now have a full time job keeping her muzzled and on a short leash.

mariposa said...

That's her plan, fool...Sue away! The trap is set.

ha ha ha ha ha...

You actually think that 15 watt idiot is capable of a deviously ingenious plan...too funny!

eng said...

Who knows who made the plan? Who knows if it will work? But keep prattling away. By the way, I don't support the NDP.

It's early days folks. Your hollering "taliban jack" actually helps in this. Your manufactured outrage, over every minuscule situation imaginable, is getting to be seen for what it is.

Just watch and see.

Elaine said...

...you lie like rug eng. You got commie written all over you.

eng said...

I'm sure you see it that way, elaine mccarthy.

I'm not the one complaining about democracy.

Elaine said...

What democracy are you talking about? Communism and democracy are two different things.

You admire a socialist/communist political party who has a woman in charge of some women thing, who wants us females to cover up at the beach.

Like bathing suit police is just not in the cards for Canadian women. You know Irene states she is talking for all women, well she isn't. I am though with this statement. Irene fuck off, we will wear what we want.

Anonymous said...

Irene is toast come the next election anyways so the sensitivity training is a waste of time for taxpayers. With her 900 vote margin of victory from 2006, her re-election was skating on thin ice to begin with.

Just need a couple bus loads of Grits at the polls to give Irene the boot. No gold-plated pension for her to retire on for either so I guess it's back to Banting High to teach for a few more years.

Elaine said...

That is all we need, is nutcase like her teaching the kids.

No wonder teenage boys feel so bad about themselves, they are taught they are all evil, by the feminazi's who have taken over real education.

eng said...

What democracy are you talking about? Communism and democracy are two different things.
You claim I am a communist on basis other than your own McCarthyism. I don't agree with you so I must be a commie, right?

Re: democracy. Sorry, my mistake. It was the other thread where democracy is the "problem" according to Peter Foster the Feudalist.


You admire a socialist/communist political party who has a woman in charge of some women thing, who wants us females to cover up at the beach.
C'mon Joe. The NDP is not communist the last I checked. But you seem to know more about them than I do. I wonder why?

What is this cover up at the beach thing? It will be interesting to hear what actual storied is being distorted by you (as usual) into "she wants females to cover up at the beach".


Like bathing suit police is just not in the cards for Canadian women. You know Irene states she is talking for all women, well she isn't. I am though with this statement. Irene fuck off, we will wear what we want.

It will be most interesting to hear the actual facts that you have now turned into "bathing suit police". Just like Irene was supposed to wear a burka or something last night?

Your creative writing is most amusing though.

Elaine said...

The burka reference was a helpful suggestion for Irene, to help her face the house. It is times like those when being a non person, with no identity, would come in handy.

Irene was offended by a female in a bathing suit, on another person's computer. So offended she linked him to the Gamil Gharbi murders. The inference being that if a male looks at females in bathing suits, they will get a gun and start killing them. If you follow Irene's logic, or lack of, the next step in her nutso world would be have us women cover up as to not provoke our own murders.

The ndp is one step away from communism. When they are holding Hugo Chavez up as one of their hero's, you know they don't have both oars in the water.

Mike said...

Now that we've all had over a decade to digest the Venona Archives, the "McCarthyism" gloss has rather lost some of its sting, wouldn't you say, eng?

mariposa said...

To get back to what this thread was all about in the first place...

eng - why are you defending her? What she did is not defendable.

Moore having pics of his gal-pal in a bikini on his computer - a total non-issue!

Irene calls this "soft porn" - "Playboy" style??? No guys buy Playboy to see girls in bikinis - you can see that in the Sears catalogue.

I guess I'm going to have to be careful to keep my Sears catalogue closed when Irene or Eng are around - don't want to offend them with pics of girls in bikinis.

eng said...

Wasn't McCarthyism referring to the witchhunts and blacklists that went on? As a thought crime, it is impossible to prove you are not a communist sympathizer. And you could be tagged as a sympathizer by anyone who wants your job, or your movie parts, your wife or your money.

amazon wouldn't let me read excerpts on that link, but it looks like spy hunting. It was well known there were always Soviet spies here and in the US.

Here, we never outlawed the communist party, and it has languished all this time in richly deserved obscurity. You might get laughed at for attending one of their meetings, but you will not be locked up, stripped of your job, or generally treated the way totalitarian dictatorships would be expected to treat you.

Here, you would have to actually commit espionage, or pass official secrets to foreign agents to be prosecuted.

eng said...

eng - why are you defending her? What she did is not defendable.
I started by postulating that this was a set up. I wonder if Moore was baiting Irene, especially since it was the eve of Dec 6. But I went with her trying to bait him. He didn't rush to sue. Maybe the discovery phase would be a little dicey? With my computer it could be! I would not call that defending her, it was your projection that said that. Soon I was required to defend myself though.

Moore having pics of his gal-pal in a bikini on his computer - a total non-issue!
Of course that is a non-issue. The issue is that he was in a public place, and a workplace. He was fucking the dog, so to speak.

Irene calls this "soft porn" - "Playboy" style??? No guys buy Playboy to see girls in bikinis - you can see that in the Sears catalogue.
She could have been referring to Playboy "lifestyle". When they have playmates at car shows and such, they are scantily clad. I haven't read Playboy in years. Have they graduated to showing public hair yet?

I guess I'm going to have to be careful to keep my Sears catalogue closed when Irene or Eng are around - don't want to offend them with pics of girls in bikinis.
Just keep them closed when you are sitting in the House of Commons please. Thank you for your consideration, Honourable mariposa, M.P.

mariposa said...

well, ya just never now when "irenes" or "engs" are around, glaring from three rows back and four rows over, squinting to see whatever they can...

the problem is, irene made such an ISSUE out of this - by trying to link the Montreal massacre to some guy looking at a girl in a bikini - that's the real issue, and that's what's really sick about mathyssen!

no comment from eng on that matter though

Elaine said...

hawk-eye Irene

Everyone in the house of commons should put a picture of a vulture munching on a carcass as the background of their desktops with the caption "Irene is watching"

eng said...

the problem is, irene made such an ISSUE out of this

No, it was a minor thing. You can watch any rerun of "Three's Company" and see exactly the same thing.

It's you that is making such an issue out of it, defending some guy caught goofing off in order to score cheap political points.


The Sun had a funny editorial cartoon today on it. That's where it belongs really, in the funny pages. Internationally, it runs along with the story of the court that issued a summons to the Disney characters.

mariposa said...

no - it was a MAJOR thing - otherwise she wouldn't have stood up in the House of Commons and made a federal case out of it, linking Moore to a mass murderer

that is no small matter

Elaine said...

It was a major thing because Irene was hoping it would ruin James Moore's life.

We females all have males in our life, that we love. There are many of us out here that do not hate men, and see them as monsters. We will fight to protect our sons, fathers, husbands and brothers from the malicious crap of the feminazi's.

Irene is the epitome of evil vicious bitch. It backfired on her, and now her polticial career is over.