Friday, August 17, 2007

How do grassroots make a professional appearance?

Easy… have the professionals make a grassroots appearance.

We are a group of Canadians dedicated to tougher gun controls in Canada.
Well, the very least you could say is that it's a "group of Canadians" (link via Small Dead Animals).

14 comments:

Elaine said...

We have 700 known Lebanese hezzasshole terrorist supporters living in Windsor, multiply that by every city in Canada, and the liberal government thinks it is a good idea to round up all the law abiding citizens guns.

Though it is more the style for the islamic terrorist to strap a bomb on themselves to go amongst innocent people to dentonate, I doubt very much they will be turning in their guns.

Elaine said...

....and then I read this in the red star this morning.

http://www.thestar.com/News/article/247575

Dainty Dion jumping up and down crying saying secret talks between Canada and the USA, with the conservative government giving the USA all our water.

Dion, you and the left are the most stupid sons-of-bitches that have walked on the face of the earth.

Morroco could take over Canada if they wanted to, thanks to the left, who dismantled our military and worked hard to turn Canada into a country without identity and chock full of useless lazy polite tits.

eng said...

No, you are not a "useless lazy polite tit", because you are not polite.

You are silly though.

How many people have "seen the light" in your opinion, and changed their political views, after listening to your comical screeching?

Elaine said...

More and more each day eng. How many hits to your London commie site do you get each week?

I read rabble, and it is dying too. It is so bad now they are having to take advertising dollars from the rag industry. A rag industry called American Apparel, who is known for its assholy treatment of workers, and the degrading of females in its advertising.

The left is dying in this country eng, and I for one am gleeful about it.

Elaine said...

The proof is in the pudding eng. Think about it. 200 lefty protestors, some dressed in clown suits, crying and stomping their feet stating the USA is going to be sucking Canada dry. It is like on one cares, cepting' the clowns. Taliban Jack didn't even show up. What is that telling you is happening to the left?
************************
Prime Minister Stephen Harper greeted U.S. President George W. Bush and Mexican President Felipe Calderon at the heavily fortified Chteau Montebello, an aging luxury resort on the banks of the Ottawa River.

The serene scene was out of sight of angry clashes between protesters and police, and Harper blew off reports of their activities.

"I've heard it's nothing," he commented to reporters over his shoulder as he waited to greet the U.S. president. "A couple of hundred? It's sad."-Canada.com

elaine said...

eng, look at this...the old fart left don't even like the young stupid left. Conspiracy on a conspiracy hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

I like your suggestion on the London commie site of holding hidden protest, as to confuse the right as to what you are protesting.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St1-WTc1kow

Elaine said...

eng, I have been looking at the pictures of the protesters and I want to ask you a serious question. Do you guys ever get anyone to support your cause who doesn't look like the display case of fishing tackle at Canadian Tire didn't fall on their heads?

eng said...

Wow, you're just full of projections, aren't you?

More and more each day eng.
I'm sure there are, at least based on your say-so.

How many hits to your London commie site do you get each week?
I did not know there is a London commie site. Why would such a thing interest me? As far as hit counts go, lots of people know how to avoid being tracked.

I read rabble
I don't, though I have heard of it. Wasn't it the place where they have moderators who fight each other?

The left is dying in this country eng, and I for one am gleeful about it.
That is your opinion, and I for one am gleeful that you believe that, so you don't get so ruffled up.

The proof is in the pudding eng. Think about it. 200 lefty protestors, some dressed in clown suits, crying and stomping their feet stating the USA is going to be sucking Canada dry. It is like on one cares, cepting' the clowns. Taliban Jack didn't even show up. What is that telling you is happening to the left?
It tells me they are all off on holidays in mid August. Or they can't take the time off to go mid week.

It tells me that they probably stopped to go camping in Algonquin, instead of going all the way to some town I've never heard of halfway between Ottawa and Montreal.

It tells me that they sent enough people there to ensure the hired stormtroopers do not hijack the situation and hand the New Government an excuse to send the soldiers into our streets.

"A couple of hundred? It's sad."
He should cheer up. The paid stormtroopers did try their best, but the real protesters got in the way, and the cops didn't really bite.


eng, look at this...the old fart left don't even like the young stupid left. Conspiracy on a conspiracy hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

The youtube link you cite shows a union leader who was involved in the protest. He is stopping the stormtroopers who have been paid to disrupt the protest. I mean really, the cops are in full riot gear, and surprise surprise, there are thugs in masks wanting to bait them? Nice try with the false flag operation. Good thing that guy was there.

Despite all the attempts to change the channel, the message did get out that the three amigos could be discussing bulk water exports.

Do you guys ever get anyone to support your cause who doesn't look like the display case of fishing tackle at Canadian Tire didn't fall on their heads
I wouldn't know, I am not one of "you guys". The paid stormtroopers looked quite smart in their crisp new camouflage clothes though.

Elaine said...

eng, even if they were talking about bulk water exports to the USA, what would the dismantle our army, take away our guns, usurp our national pride left do about it?

I suppose you think the thugs sitting around the UN table will step in and up to the plate for Canada. You better think again. I can see a food for water scandal in the making.

If water is on the table, it is best to negotiate a deal with the USA, who we depend on to protect us.

Do you think other, more hostile countries would not be looking at Canada, and its natural resources as if we were a Thanksgiving dinner?

The only thing the left did at that protest was remove any doubt that they are brain dead ineffective misguided fools.

eng said...

The only thing the left did at that protest was remove any doubt that they are brain dead ineffective misguided fools.

They achieved their goal. They made it very difficult for Harper to even talk about bulk water exports later. He was forced to deny it now, so a stealth campaign to bring it in later will be much more difficult.

eng, even if they were talking about bulk water exports to the USA, what would the dismantle our army, take away our guns, usurp our national pride left do about it?

The "left" would stand up for our rights to our own water, rather than do a cowardly secret giveaway. If every negotiation with the US is to become a military confrontation as you suggest, then why not go ahead with the Anchlauss right away and be done with it? They would never give us statehood, but maybe we can be a Guam or something.

There is certainly room for a fair arrangement, not one that requires us to pour 100% of the water into the southbound ditch. That's the current kind of "deal" that has been outlined. If there is a drought, we would not be allowed to apportion the resource, we would have to provide 100% of what we did the previous year, and too bad for us if that is 100% of the total. We get to do without.

I thought the right wingers were all so brave and won't be bullied by anyone. Yes, you sit at your keyboard saying you won't be bullied by nomads in caves, but you just turn to jellybeans when it comes to anything substantial, like keeping our water.

The "left" as you call it went to war against Hitler. They were not appeasers like Conservative Chamberlain. They were not supporting Hitler, like Prescott Bush.

But you wouldn't understand standing up for something would you?

Elaine said...

Ha! the left was Hitler, remember national socialist party?

In the prewar years, the CCF, predecessor of the NDP, responded with a pacifist stance: support to the League of Nations but opposition to Canada's entering an imperialist war. The left was forced to go to second world war. You should be glad about that, or you would be speaking German, and eating your dinner by candlelight. Oh, I forgot, you wanted that.


I don't feel bullied by the USA. I know you don't realize that we do 80 percent of our trade with the USA. Without them, we are sweet fuck all. I am quite relieved that they have been protecting our asses all these years when the liberals were in power.

I do stand up eng, but I don't stoop to sneaky terrorist tactics as the left do. If I am coming at you, there will be no doubt who I am ,and why I am doing it.

eng said...

Hitler's "national socialism" was his name for fascism. Look it up. How are they socialist? By nationalizing industry? No, they didn't do that. They had a corporatist state, which is one definition of fascism. I will leave it to your other contributors to "prove" Hitler was actually a socialist. Good luck. Will they hang their proof on the name of the Nazi party? Do you then believe the "Democratic Republic of Korea" is in any way democratic? I don't. Their say so does not make it so. Hitler was an extreme right winger.


The left was forced to go to second world war.
Bullshit. Tommy Douglas, though not the leader of the CCF at the time, enlisted. The party in power at the time was the Liberals, remember? Forced? Hah! Meanwhile in the US, another "lefty" brought the US into the war. Ever read about GWB's grandfather, Prescott Bush? He supported Hitler.


I did not claim we are bullied by the USA, you claimed any negotiation would lead to war. You're trying to make partisan points about our underfunded military. They can be fair points in other areas, but do you seriously believe we can build a military force that could resist a determined US invasion? One MIRV knocks out all our provincial capitals, and they have thousands of those.

The US likes to be protecting us. They forced our Conservative government of the day to scrap the Avro Arrow, because it beat the crap out of anything they had and could literally fly rings around their best fighters.

The point remains, that the current government would give away the store, in exchange for sweet fuck all. The protesters just made it more difficult to give away the water by stealth.

I do stand up eng, but I don't stoop to sneaky terrorist tactics as the left do. If I am coming at you, there will be no doubt who I am ,and why I am doing it.

No, you spew on a blog and not much else. You try the Ann Coulter style of in-your-face bullshit, but you missed the boat by about three years. That ship has sailed, everyone is on to that kind of stuff and we will not allow the right wing extremists to manipulate us any longer.

The fright wing has no clothes.

Elaine said...

eng, you mean like you and taliban Jack's hero, Hugo Chávez, of the democratic socialist party who just voted himself president for life? Are you really that mentally challenged that you can't see the similarities between him and Hitler?

here eng, perhaps some reading for you and the other ndp zombies. They had to drag you from under your beds to go and fight for your country.

http://eprints.cddc.vt.edu/marxists/history/canada/socialisthistory/Docs/History/Left-in-WW2.htm

The protestors did nothing, except give us all a good laugh. You don't get it, we are taking the country back from those who would destroy it by virtue of their selfish stupidity.

eng said...

eng, you mean like you and taliban Jack's hero, Hugo Chávez, of the democratic socialist party who just voted himself president for life? Are you really that mentally challenged that you can't see the similarities between him and Hitler?


First of all, Chavez did not vote himself president for life. He increased the term of office to 7 years, and abolished any limit on how many times someone can hold the presidency. He still must run and win elections. Incumbency certainly helps, but he must still run in and win elections. They still allow other parties.

If he is elected by the people, why do you call that bad? It seems you think it is ok for people to be exploited by mining companies, as if it their choice, so why not someone who is actually elected by the people?

My problem with Chavez is that the elections there use machines programmed by friends of his government, and the programming is kept secret, even from researchers. The exit polls in the last election do not match the machine counted results. Same problem as exists in the US, with Diebold counting votes, using secret programming as well.

Are you really that mentally challenged that you can't see the similarities between him and Hitler?

Chavez is nationalizing industry. Hitler did not nationalize any companies. On the contrary, he privatized many activities. For example, the manufacture of Zyklon-B was handled for the Nazis by Dessauer Werke für Zucker and Chemische Werke.

In early years, Hitler made socialist noises because that was popular at the time. But he certainly did not implement a socialist agenda. It most closely resembled a fascist state.

As far as similarities with Chavez go, both were wildly popular, both have big egos, but we haven't heard about any concentration camps or genocides in Venezuela yet. Hitler murdered many of his left wing opponents, I don't know if Chavez is murdering his (presumably right wing) opponents.

They had to drag you from under your beds to go and fight for your country.

I wasn't around then, but my father was already in the Navy before Canada even entered WWII.

The protestors did nothing, except give us all a good laugh.

Yes, it was hilarious when the undercover cop with the rock got caught, ordered to put down the rock which he refused to do, and he had to run to the police lines to be "arrested".

But it could easily have turned into a bloodbath. Sounds like they were planning a Reichstag fire type of false flag operation, that would be blamed on anyone who opposes the New Government.

But the protest was a success. The New Government will find it very difficult to put our water on the table without there being a real debate about it. Real debate is something we are not seeing thyese days, just government propaganda and sloganeering and smearing.

You don't get it, we are taking the country back from those who would destroy it by virtue of their selfish stupidity.

Dream on. You are the ones who want to destroy the country, get us at each other's throats, sell the resources for next tonothing, and leave us all scavenging in dumps. All due to the selfish stupidity of our current leaders.

The rest of us are on to you. You will not succeed in your attempt to take over and set up your dictatorship.